Cul De Sac Politics

Political Pulse is compiled and written by Jaime Kenedeno. This week's contributors include Dannoynted1, and CCNEMO If YOU want to Contribute to our team efforts, have a tip or you need the ENGAGEMENT & INTERACTIVE ; Team Kenedeno respectfully brings it to YOU. Then it is up to you to do your homework. Contact Jaime at 361 851-2851 or jaime@kenedeno.com

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Leverage Buy

Local
APAC reduces workers

By Fanny S. Chirinos (Contact)
Saturday, July 7, 2007
Corpus Christi quietly has lost hundreds of jobs during the past year, the result of downsizing and high turnover at one of the city's largest employers.

The losses at APAC Customer Services occurred unannounced to the public, other than notations required in filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission because APAC is a publicly traded company. The shrouded approach was a stark contrast to the buyout tone at the company during the past few years when it told economic development officials it would be able to hire hundreds of new employees each year. In July 2006, the company ranked as the city's 10th largest employer with 1,200 employees, according to the city's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. It now has about 620 employees.

George Hepburn, APAC's chief financial officer at the corporate office in Deerfield, Ill., said the company hasn't downsized in the past year and has had about 600 employees in Corpus Christi since last July. The company also relocated its office in Corpus Christi to the downtown Frost Bank building to accommodate the smaller work force, as it was using only half of its call center at 4525 Ayers St., Hepburn said.

"We were approached by the landlord who wanted to take back the building for a former tenant," said Hepburn, who didn't know who the identity of the former tenant. "Rent costs went down and now our employees have a view of the bay."

The landlord of the Ayers Street location is listed as Commercial Net Lease Realty, an Orlando-based company now known as National Retail Property. Calls to National Retail were not returned Friday.

Roland Mower, president and CEO of the Corpus Christi Regional Economic Development Corp., said the decrease in APAC's number of employees could be because of high turnover and a company decision not to fill those positions. He said the losses are being absorbed by the community and are not making a significant impact on Corpus Christi's employment.

Hepburn would not comment on the disparity or why the company did not fill the positions.

"My guess," Mower said, "is that most of the people who left have found other jobs. I would guess the industry turnover is about 100 (percent) to 200 percent. So if a company has 100 employees, they could go through 200 employees within a year. Sometimes people quit because they had something else lined up."

APAC officials approached the Economic Development Corp. last fall saying they were thinking of leaving Corpus Christi and requested a subsidy, a grant from the city, as incentive to stay. The Economic Development Corp. board recommended the city grant a $400,000 subsidy to be paid during the course of five years in exchange for APAC maintaining at least 539 employees, Mower said.

Irma Caballero, the city's director of economic development, said the City Council should consider the subsidy in the next couple of months.

The company operates eight call centers throughout the United States, but is moving some operations offshore. It is downsizing its call center in Tucson, Ariz., and expanding facilities in the Phillippines.

Contact Fanny S. Chirinos at 886-3759 or chirinosf@caller.com




(38) User Comments:
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 460608 on July 7, 2007 at 6:08 a.m.

Let's see. APAC's starting is what? $2.65 an hour? Or, whatever the minimum wage is. The lost jobs were absorbed by the community. Where? Mowing lawns, house cleaning, car washes, Stripes stores, Whataburgers, not Commons it isnt opened yet.

And, APAC wants the city to hand over how much money to stay in town? With the pro-growth faction in this city they should have asked for double.

Now they are going off-shore. Where the starting salary will be next to nothing, and APAC pays no taxes.

APAC should have asked the city of Corpus Christi for triple.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 414367 on July 7, 2007 at 6:49 a.m.

Any company opening businesses in other countries should be required to pay US wages and benefits. And be required to observe our anti-polutions laws.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 317094 on July 7, 2007 at 9:51 a.m.

The world is always better off with fewer telephone marketers. Do not use the phone I pay for, that I have for my personal use, to market your product. Good riddance.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 243280 on July 7, 2007 at 10:02 a.m.

newsman, I agree with you but APAC is an imcoming call only customer service business which provides good jobs to be used as a stepping stone to something better.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 700712 on July 7, 2007 at 11:09 a.m.

APAC has always paid $6.00-$7.00/hr or more. And good benefits.

The thing is the jobs are so darn boring, that the turnover is hell. Nobody ever stays for long. And everybody knows, that having to keep training, training, traning, costs horrendous.

But it's sneaky how they have changed their profile as one of the major employers in town to none of them with nary a word to the public. God job, Caller-Times, for ferreting the truth out about this.

APAC has milked the "Economic Development" people for all they could, but when it went downhill, they went downhill real stickum.

Good riddance, APAC, I think everybody who ever wanted to work for APAC has, and never wants to again.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 255027 on July 7, 2007 at 1:33 p.m.

Let all the cities, counties, states, and federal government continue to subsidize these bribery artists. It's only money! Why should ANY government agency have to give abatements, subsidies or anything else for that matter? If a company wants to come to Corpus Christi, Nueces County, or Texas, let it be because the weather is somewhat better year round, and THERE ARE willing and skilled workers, but not willing indentured servants. If someone responds with; "well, they provide jobs!" That they do is to be sure, but what kind, and how secure? People need to be paid above the poverty line level just to get by. The money that has been blown by the city, county or state to get companies to come here could have been used in so many better ways, like infrastructure (jobs), work incentive programs for teens (jobs) a better paid police force (better moral and benefits to those that watch over us). This free teat to companies that won't come here unless they get some green under the table can't and shouldn't stand anymore.

As for companies locating overseas, let's say, hmmm! Hey! Halliburton! $20 Billion for contracts in Iraq and they are moving their headquarters to Dubai to avoid paying taxes. Not a bad combination, war profiteers, and unpatriotic profiteers at that by not paying badly needed taxes to support the TROOPS they tell the world that they support so fervently. Contracts gotten by, shall we say, DUBIOUS means (Pun intended on Dubai just in case anyone missed it) with their connections to the Halliburton House...SORRY, I misspoke; I meant the Dick and George One Trick Pony Show. Who knows how many other companies are gone already, or are planning to outsource some more of their work to India, China, Mexico, ad nauseum? Just think if Congress ever really got their act together and gathered some testicular fortitude and passed a law that says, if you move out of the U. S., all laws for polluting, taxes, and penalties for not making the country they move to better for the people there (read maquiladoras) remain the same no matter where you headquarter yourselves so that the fighting men and women of the United Stated Armed Forces have the money provided by your tax dollars (since you would want the same troops to go and get you out of the country or countries you moved to save your bacon) to have the wherewithal to have only the best of everything they need, before, during, and AFTER the fight, and not just let them become homeless, forgotten "heroes" that we hold up to the limelight when there is a battle to be fought, and then drop them like a sack of rotten potatoes nobody needs or wants anymore afterwards. Hey, I have an idea, why don't these companies that go overseas adopt a battalion each and see to their needs since it is generally in their interest that battles are fought for anyway! Come on what do you say all you patriotic tax dodgers? Let's show everybody HOW BLOODY patriotic you REALLY are!
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 241752 on July 7, 2007 at 5:41 p.m.

Apac is not the only company in Town here to go India.
Check out First Data they were bought out by some other company. Now they are moving there business to a foreign country.
they call my house and they will get a Hang up.
or if i call one of these 1-800 #'s and some accent is on the other end. i will not do business with what ever company it is.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 390982 on July 7, 2007 at 5:48 p.m.

That's what you people get for crying for more malls instead of better paying jobs, Cudos to the city council for developing shopping malls and no relevant jobs.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 251916 on July 7, 2007 at 6:51 p.m.

This is where you have to be careful about offering incentives...make sure that when you do offer them, that if the company pulls out, because they think it's cheaper to do business elsewhere, that they pay for it. Offer them a lot of carrots for doing the right thing, but be prepared to whack the heck out of them with a stick if they do the wrong thing. I thought the comment made about the employees having a bay view, is kind of a cheap slap across the face to the workforce. I'd rather have stability, than a "bay view". One good thing, is that the job losses were absorbed, and that's better than NOT having those losses absorbed. I hope that the CCEDC is working on updating their website, as far as what their current projects and plans are for attracting business to the city and area. I agree with the notion that the entire coastal bend region needs to work as a region, and not in competition with each other. I have to admit, for all the bad news that could be said about the area, the good thing is that the port is strong, the La Quinta tradeport is a reality and the Joe Fulton corridor is about finished. Given that this city has such a strong base with the port, existing petrochemical facilities and a strong healthcare base, I would think the best bet would be enticing medical device manufacturers to move here. With Corpus Christi's lower costs vs. elsewhere in the country, even vs. Austin, which is a technological powerhouse, this would be a good niche area to develop and grow.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 378762 on July 7, 2007 at 6:55 p.m.

I agree with jalongoria, the money spent to lure stores to the Commons, should go to court national and international business.

Yes the Commons will have stores which will hire people but those salaries will be minimum wage to probably a dolllar over and have just as much of a high turn over rate as APAC.

If Corpus is to be a player on the world market it needs to draw real business that pay higher than minimum wage salaries
and offer real incentives to keep those national based corps in Corpus.

San Antonio, Houston, Dallas, Ft. Worth, Austin did not get to where they are today by giving tax breaks and incentives so more malls could be built, no they used the tax dollars to go out and court big industry.

The powers that be will always have small town mindedness and until that mindset is wiped out Corpus will never truly compete on the world market.

Until the good old boy system is abolished in Corpus it will be business as usual and the citizens suffer because the CIty Council and others have decided Malls are more important.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 698928 on July 7, 2007 at 9:36 p.m.

I worked at APAC for 2 years and was fired about 5 months ago on a lame and over-trumped violation of "rules". ( I told a customer conversationally that I had 2 minutes until I went home this was something I had done probable 100 times. Others were fired when a supervisor told them to clock in from lunch and then take another 30 minutes they didn't like the way the reps handled doing it and fired about 10 people in one day. APAC was trying its hardest to downsize without paying unemployment, and they did just that.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 376168 on July 8, 2007 at 2:49 a.m.

corpus will always be a small town so get used to it. took me 40 years to get out never will miss it.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 251916 on July 8, 2007 at 3:18 p.m.

Vivian,
Austin has used tif's for retail development, and I should know, as I LIVE in Austin. We just built the Domain in far north Austin, on a parcel of land that used to be the old IBM complex that had been vacated. There's going to be a lot more tax revenue and subsequential development happening as a result. It has been a huge success, and we're better for it. It's another development feather in our cap, another reason why people want to come here, and why business wants to come here. Corpus Christi doesn't have enough good retail, or attractions to make most businesses want to come there. You've got to develop all aspects of your economy, not just parts of it. you keep saying "no" to everything, going nowhere, and not improving things...and then whine and gripe about how businesses won't come? If you treat developers of proposed attractions and retail so negatively, don't you think that they don't talk about how they were treated? You've said "No" for so long, and you have nothing to offer anyone who would want to come in with the jobs. Why else do you think the Valley is putting corpus to shame? Why do you think Port Aransas and Rockport are moving forward, but CC is just stagnating. What good have you done the city and the region with your attitude?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 701003 on July 9, 2007 at 6:45 a.m.

Corpus doesn't want new. Years ago Bass Pro huge store in Houston,Dallas was wanting to come into the bayfront area. Our guys said NO!!!! Corpus wants only what they want small. People it's not going to happen as long as they continue to say NO! I don't blame these guys not to come when they tag it as no better not!!
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 700712 on July 9, 2007 at 9:58 a.m.

San Antonio and many other towns have used TIFs to lure Japanese automakers to their towns.

Now there are jobs we all could use.

Why aren't the City's lobbyists going after the automakers? We have plenty of space for a big car factory. If First Data moves out, there's one big spot, and there's empty space next to them.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 287385 on July 9, 2007 at 11:03 a.m.

Put APACs business and what you think of it aside because you are all missing the point. When ANY company sees its workforce cut in half and keeps it as much of a secret as possible, what is happening? They are not performing well enough to employ their previous numbers. How many businesses do you know of would cut their workforce and sacrifice more revenue if they had enough business to support it?

So, how much sense does it make to give $400,000.00 to a business that is not performing well? Does simply throwing money at a problem (or problems!) fix it?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 700473 on July 9, 2007 at 12:08 p.m.

I think this says it all

http://www.coastalbend.com/CorpusChri...

If you cant get to this link, go to coastalbend.com
For Corpus Christi, click on that recent story for
"having to work on my own time"
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 702352 on July 9, 2007 at 5:28 p.m.

"Rent costs went down and now our employees have a view of the bay"---This is what APAC was pushing to their employees when they were told APAC was moving downtown. I'd rather have stability than a view by the bay. Sounds to me APAC is deciding to pull out of Corpus. APAC has always been sneaky about everything they do. I remember when a someone wanted to start a union. What happened to this person? This person got fired not for trying to start a union, but for his stats. We all know the real reason why this person got fired. I wouldn't be suprised if APAC decided to pull out next month.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699743 on July 10, 2007 at 11:40 a.m.

Are you kidding me? APAC was some of the best Sexcapades of my life...The girls there were like very plentiful and easy to date. it was a meat market as far as I'm concerned. Girls and Guys sleepingaround all over the place...Like a true life soap opera even though I only worked there for two months...Same with SITEL...WOOO WEeeeee..
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 252777 on July 11, 2007 at 7:24 a.m.

That place (APAC) is a gossiping mess...more so than the average workplace. I will never understand how it lasted as long as it did! The training, the "at-will" hiring and firing policy, etc....just added to the debacle. Not to mention the place was filthy....dirty! Sorry about the job loss for those who lost them, but believe me, if you get in a comfort zone at APAC....you are in real trouble and so is your future. Consider this a blessing to move on to a better place in life.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699743 on July 11, 2007 at 8:41 a.m.

You got that right! It WAS a really dirty place...I am pretty ashamed of myself for have worked in such a place. Promiscuity and all kinds of Debauchery!!! I found out some of my co-workers had caught STDs from some of the girls there. I got checked IMMEDIATELY after this and to my very fortunate suprise I was clean and then QUIT that gestation of lust and drama...
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 461718 on July 11, 2007 at 9:44 a.m.

so what lesson did we learn JOSE???
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 461718 on July 11, 2007 at 9:50 a.m.

hey so which people did they let go? the ones with all the STD's? sorry I had to throw that in...
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699743 on July 11, 2007 at 10:38 a.m.

Lesson learned = Don't eat the Apple just because it's shiny and pretty...
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 399857 on July 11, 2007 at 11:57 a.m.

My fiance worked for apac for maybe 10 months, I didn't like his hours, so I convinced him to find a better job. After he applied a couple of places, they called his supervisor at apac to ask about my fiances performance. His Sup. was not too pleased about it. The supervisor then called my fiance into his office and told him "If you don't want to be here then leave NOW!" and pointed to the door. All because he was seeking WAY BETTER opportunities. WHAT THE HELL DOES APAC EXPECT? FOR PEOPLE TO MAKE A CARREER OUT OF ANSWERING PHONES? I'm so glad he got out of that disgusting place!
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 702463 on July 11, 2007 at 12:17 p.m.

I was a team lead at APAC for almost a year, and was never treated the way an employee of a "major corporation" should be treated! They were finding any way they possibly could to get rid of jobs, promised pay raises that never came to fruition, and were always making changes to "better" the company for everyone. Turns out the changes were to better the company for itself, not for everyone involved. I agree that APAC was full of drama, was basically a den of sin for sexually promiscuous people, and was not the shining example of a stellar corporation. They told people that all was well, and then pulled the rug out from underneath them in true APAC fashion. The city council simply needs to overlook any kind of subsidy or grant for this company and let them leave, because thats what they are going to do anyway! As someone not originally from here, this city needs major businesses to come in here and allow this city to expand the economy. If this city had a better economy, and more major corporate jobs, this would be an even more amazing place to live! Corpus has so much to offer, and yet does so little to attract people to it. Good riddance APAC, and to my former fellow co-workers, I am sorry if you lost your job because of this disaster of a company. The job market here is very tough, but I hope you all find something much better!
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699743 on July 11, 2007 at 2:05 p.m.

It wasn't much difference at 1st data... I worked these jobs right out of High School while going to college. These aren't REAL jobs...Please...You'll never be able to support a wife and family with this hole of a job. The sad thing is that The Best Company out of the three was SITEL. At least they were cool with their people. I moved up with SITEL because of my tech experience...That helped me get into the IT field. APAC (More like 2PAC and leave) Was a worthless waste of time, except for the dating experience... The higher position managers would take advantage of their powers and sleep with all the hotties first before letting them to the rest of the denizens. Some of these girls and guys worked up the ladder to higher positions within the company just by sleeing with the right people on the management staff. I kid you not...It is SAD but I am glad it finally backfired on them. Sad to all the "Good" employees who were just trying to make through college or get some bread on the table.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 699743 on July 11, 2007 at 2:14 p.m.

BTW...Everything I've been talking about was 10 years ago.
FYI
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 702497 on July 11, 2007 at 9:47 p.m.

Money + Greed = Failing Economy. Isnt CC a great place to live?
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 330390 on July 11, 2007 at 10:29 p.m.

well I worked at apac from 97-00.. I made about 10.75 an hour. but i live in waco now and have never made what I make now here in waco. And I think Waco is much smaller than Corpus and make a heck of alot more now. But I did use APAC as a stepping stone.
Sad to hear that its leaving or has downsized.
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 269864 on July 12, 2007 at 2:04 a.m.

I suggest Mr. Mower who gets paid to do who knows watt.....should move to the TWC building and hang with his drones.

The CCREDC is nothing more than Bloodsucking mosquitos who are paid to utilize taxpayer money to pay their "1 Shoreline plaza office rent,AEP, Water and gas bill all funded by you the sales tax paying public.

No mention that APAC is given 2500 dollars everytime they hire a "working poor" Medicaid recipient and TWC makes the "stats" look like they are finding people JOBS.

The fact is if they hire someone for one day they still recieve the 2500. So let mr. mower pay Walter Bryan who runs the place (APAC) the $400K out of his 1 million dollar budget funded by the City Of Corpus Christi Taxpayers to make money off the working poor.

Why are we paying for him to steal money and CCREDC rent at the most expensive office property in town?

Corporate Welfare in the name of "Economic Development"

The only economy they are developing is their own!
Reply to this Post | Suggest removal
related links Posted by 462089 on September 21, 2007 at 1:49 p.m.

Ya know if they are going to give out any money.. They should look at giving it to the poor folks like me who work there, and have to come in to work early to set up a computer and find a different chair to sit in every single day and set up programs every single day and not get paid a dime for the whole time I am doing it.. For the time that I have to come in on my own time, early again to read about the changes they made to policy that noone told anyone about.. They give us a WHOPPING 3 minutes a day, to turn on the computer, start up the programs and change the log ins and update ourself, anything over the 3 minutes and we are subject to termination.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, January 17, 2008

EL Defenzor.net: First and Foremost Homero Villarreal is My Friend.

Like Big John Mc Carthy says, "Let's Get It On"

If one disputes any claim by all means welcome to the show and put it (your dispute or objection) in writing. We run from nobody.

"Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends
We're so glad you could attend, come inside, come inside
There behind a glass stands a real blade of grass
Be careful as you pass,.move along, move along

Come inside, the show's about to start
Guaranteed to blow your head apart
Rest assured you'll get your money's worth
The greatest show in Heaven, Hell or Earth
You've got to see the show, it's a dynamo
You've got to see the show, it's rock and roll, oh

Sunday, January 13, 2008

South Texas Chisme: Nueces County Sheriff proves he is a Republican

South Texas Chisme: Nueces County Sheriff proves he is a Republican

"People have a perception of who you are based on how you look," Kaelin said. "It is time to let the public know that there has been a change."

We at Los Kenedenos have received information (unconfirmed) that one of the new patrol vehicles has been totaled.

Why didnt anyone let the public know that one of these brand new cruisers has already been totaled.

If this is true (and it is believed to be true), why has the Good Sheriff not let us know of the bad news.

We need to hear the bad news immediately.

Monday, January 07, 2008

A literal reading of section 36.131(c) is that appellant may be prosecuted under either section 36.002 of the human resources code or section 31.03 of

Send this document to a colleague Close This Window












NUMBER 13-05-00314-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

LEONARD CRENSHAW, Appellant,


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 105th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa



A jury found appellant, Leonard Crenshaw, guilty of the offense of securing the execution of a document by deception (count 1); (1) the offense of theft (count 2); (2) and the offense of medicaid fraud (count 3). (3)

The trial court assessed appellant's punishment at fifteen years' imprisonment for count 1, fifteen years' imprisonment for count 2, and ten years' imprisonment for count 3. The court ordered all sentences to run concurrently. In two issues appellant contends the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion to dismiss count 1 on limitations grounds, and (2) denying his motion that the State elect between counts 2 and 3. We affirm counts 1 and 2, and vacate and render count 3. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.1(b).

A. Limitations

In his first issue, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash count 1 of the indictment because it was barred by limitations.

The sufficiency of an indictment is a question of law. State v. Moff, 154 S.W.3d 599, 601 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). When the resolution of a question of law does not turn on the evaluation of the credibility and demeanor of a witness, the trial court is not in a better position to make the determination and the appellate court should conduct a de novo review of the issue. Id.; see Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85, 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Because the trial court's decision in this case was based on appellant's motion to quash, the State's response, and the argument of counsel, we conduct a de novo review of the trial court's ruling. See Moff, 154 S.W.3d at 601; see also State v. Rosenblum, 910 S.W.2d 934, 948 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (dissenting op. adopted on reh'g) (sufficiency of indictment at pretrial motion to quash cannot be supported or defeated by evidence).

The limitation period for the offense of securing the execution of a document by deception is seven years from the date of the commission of the offense. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 12.01(3)(B) (Vernon Supp. 2006). A person commits the offense of securing the execution of a document by deception "if, with intent to defraud or harm any person, he, by deception . . . causes another to sign or execute any document affecting property or service or the pecuniary interest of any person." Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 32.46(a) (Vernon Supp. 2006). A crime is complete for purposes of limitations only when all elements have been completed. Barnes v. State, 824 S.W.2d 560, 562 (Tex. Crim. App.1991), overruled on other grounds by Proctor v. State, 967 S.W.2d 840 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); see Ex parte Tamez, 4 S.W.3d 854 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999), aff'd Ex parte Tamez, 38 S.W.3d 159 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Before the offense of securing the execution of a document by deception can be committed and complete, a document must be signed or executed which would affect property or services or the pecuniary interest of any person. Mills v. State, 722 S.W.2d 411, 416 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986).

Appellant argues that the offense of securing the execution of a document by deception was complete on August 9, 1996, when he signed his application with the Texas Board of Examiners of Professional Counselors. However, all the elements of the offense were not complete until July 6, 1998, when the State of Texas issued and signed appellant's license to practice as a professional counselor. Appellant was indicted on January 27, 2005, for securing the execution of a document by deception. Because January 27, 2005, is within the seven-year limitations period, we conclude the trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to quash count 1 of the indictment. Appellant's first issue is overruled.

B. Denial of Motion to Order State to Elect Between Counts

In his second issue, appellant contends the trial court erred in submitting both counts 2 and 3 to the jury. Specifically, appellant asserts that section 36.131(c) of the human resources code provides for the prosecution of either count 2 or count 3, but not both. See Tex. Hum. Res. Code Ann. § 36.131(c), repealed by Act of May 23, 2005, 79th Leg., R.S., ch. 807, § 19, Tex. Gen. Laws 2789. (4)

We agree.

Section 36.131(c) of the Texas Human Resources Code provides:

If conduct constituting an offense under this section also constitutes an offense under another provision of law, including a provision in the Penal Code, the actor may be prosecuted under either this section or the other provision.


Tex. Hum. Res. Code Ann. § 36.131(c). We look to the literal text of the statute for its meaning, and we ordinarily give effect to that plain meaning, unless application of the statute's plain language would lead to absurd consequences that the legislature could not possibly have intended, or if the plain language is ambiguous. Boykin v. State, 818 S.W.2d 782, 785 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Bunton v. State, 136 S.W.3d 355, 363 (Tex. App.-Austin 2004, pet. ref'd); see State v. Webb, 12 S.W.3d 808, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

The conduct that is the subject of counts 2 and 3 is as follows. Appellant ran a business called Behavioral Concepts. Appellant's business was an after-school program, which provided at-risk children tutoring and homework help. Although appellant never provided any individual counseling for mental disease or deficiency, he billed the Medicaid program for such services, and was paid in excess of $100,000. Such conduct constitutes an offense under both the human resources code and the penal code. See Tex. Hum. Res. Code Ann. § 36.002(1)(A) (Vernon Supp. 2006); Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 31.03 (Vernon Supp. 2006).

A literal reading of section 36.131(c) is that appellant may be prosecuted under either section 36.002 of the human resources code or section 31.03 of the penal code, but not both. If the legislature intended the possibility of prosecution under both provisions, it could have easily provided language allowing for prosecution under both as it has in other statutes. See, e.g., Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 38.04(d) (Vernon 2003) (providing that "[a] person who is subject to prosecution under both this section and another law may be prosecuted under either or both this section and the other"). Thus, the State was not authorized to seek convictions for both offenses. The proper remedy is to reform the judgment by vacating the lesser conviction and sentence. See Ochoa v. State, 982 S.W.2d 904, 908 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Appellant's second issue is sustained.

C. Conclusion

Accordingly, we vacate the trial court's judgment of conviction and sentence for the offense of medicaid fraud (count 3) and render judgment that appellant be acquitted of that charge. We affirm the trial court's judgment of conviction and sentence for the offenses of securing the execution of a document by deception (count 1) and the offense of theft (count 2).

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA

Justice


Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 28th day of August, 2006.

1. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 32.46 (Vernon Supp. 2006).

2. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 31.03 (Vernon Supp. 2006).

3. See Tex. Hum. Res. Code Ann. § 36.002(1)(A) (Vernon Supp. 2006). Certain amendments to section 36.002 became effective after the date of this offense. However, the provisions under which the State charged appellant remained unchanged. Accordingly, we cite to the current version of the statute.

4. Section 36.131 of the Texas Human Resources Code was repealed effective September 1, 2005. See Act of May 23, 2005, 79th Leg., R.S., ch. 807, § 19, Tex. Gen. Laws 2789. However, "[c]onduct that occurs before the effective date of [the] Act is governed by the law in effect at the time the conduct occurred, and that law is continued in effect for that purpose." Act of May 23, 2005, 79th Leg., R.S., ch. 807, § 20(a), Tex. Gen. Laws 2789.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, May 25, 2007

Texas State Representative House District 33: Keep Your Promises Solly. Remember Miller? Why are CCISD Students still running at large during school d

Texas State Representative House District 33: Keep Your Promises Solly. Remember Miller? Why are CCISD Students still running at large during school day hours?

Friday, May 25, 2007

Keep Your Promises Solly. Remember Miller? Why are CCISD Students still running at large during school day hours?



CCISD: Why are CCISD Students allowed to run at large during school day hours?



Education is for our Children, our Youth, our Future. Children and Youth need constant redirection and set boundaries at home and at school as well. When a minor is allowed to run at large during the school day hours whether it is in the halls, leaving or returning a closed campus or simply unaccounted for is irresponsible of the caretaker whose custody in which he / she is placed.
Kenedeno



An absent student is one who does not arrive at school in the morning and is absent for the WHOLE Day. The student was never on campus. The Parent is responsible for the student getting to school (requiring the student to attend school). If the student does not get to school it is the Parent’s responsibility not necessarily the Parent’s fault. There are circumstances where the student will walk in the front door and out the back door without attending a single class. This is where the attendance officers need to improve their due diligence like the old days.

Once the student is counted present in the morning; the Parent has required the student (child) to attend school. Once the student is verified in attendance at the beginning of the school day the student is in the custody of the School.

If the student is tardy or skips class (on campus or off campus) this happens on the watch of the school. The Parent if informed should cooperate and communicate with the School Counselors Administrators and the Attendance Officer to correct the behavior. The Security and Attendance officer should take notice and tighten the belt. This is a security issue as well; there is no excuse for students coming and going outside of the lunch period and it is imperative that attendance irregularities be dealt with within 24 hours. This is easily done with our modern technology.

Instead, what we are seeing is the Attendance Officers documenting the absences as they accumulate and filing on the Parent and student when the number of absences are achieved.

Solly, did you forget about the issues and the kids at Miller and CCISD as a whole?

South Texas Chisme: Chisme roundup

Posted on May 15, 2006 at 06:55:18 PM by Jaime Kenedeno ... sources at ccisd downtown have said that a miller hs asst. principal has become a whistleblower. ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/05/chisme-roundup.html - 48k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

South Texas Chisme: Solomon Ortiz Jr. on the ballot for State Rep D33!

I am Jaime Kenedeno of South Texas. A simple Google search will inform you more of WHO I Am. ... The credentials of Noyola and the CCISD / Miller fiasco was ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/08/solomon-ortiz-jr-on-ballot-for-state.html - 31k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

South Texas Chisme: Truth? you cant handle the truth!

That hadn't happened in years, that is why Miller was facing sanctions from the feds (before noyola's time). And Kenedeno is right, we can't support the ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/07/truth-you-cant-handle-truth.html - 35k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

South Texas Chisme: New block walking program in Corpu$

Posted on May 29, 2006 at 01:28:04 AM by Jaime Kenedeno ... Roy Miller’s political skills, vision brought Corpus Christi into the modern era ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/05/new-block-walking-program-in-corpu.html - 42k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

South Texas Chisme: Lets see how you dance to this tune

All the Talk Radio stations will be talking about the Miller HS issue as well as ... From: Jaime Kenedeno [mailto:kingalonzoalvarezdepinedaxiii@gmail.com] ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/07/lets-see-how-you-dance-to-this-tune.html - 46k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

South Texas Chisme: Race for State Rep. District 33 gets HOT

It said that the whistleblowers name at Miller was former assistant ... Jamie Kenedeno, no I just thought it would be fun to do something like that poem. ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/07/race-for-state-rep-district-33-gets.html - 43k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

South Texas Chisme: Who's the REAL enemy?

... Sr. attempts to manipulate the vote and his performance at Miller HS last year. ... Jaime Kenedeno/Haley, Who Knows why he writes anything that he does. ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/09/whos-real-enemy.html - 53k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

South Texas Chisme: PULP FICTION & The Award Winning Caller-Times

... an article on July 23rd entitled PAPER WON’T REPORT RUMORS AT MILLER HIGH, ... Thanks for watching my back, Kenedeno. At 4:19 AM, Jaime Kenedeño said. ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/07/pulp-fiction-award-winning-caller.html - 22k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

South Texas Chisme: Dangerous chisme?

When we write something us here at Kenedeno & Associates believe it to be true. ... in example will be the one that Danny Noyola was removed from Miller. ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/06/dangerous-chisme.html - 27k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

South Texas Chisme: HD 33 shuffle

Danny Noyola, Sr., recently reassigned from Miller HS principal to Moody assistant principal, ... Posted on July 3, 2006 at 09:51:17 PM by Jaime Kenedeno ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/07/hd-33-shuffle.html - 37k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

South Texas Chisme: Once again the Caller times tells only half truth

-Jane Wall – Current teacher and former Miller HS journalism instructor “As a Precinct chair, ... Political Pulse: Kenedeno’s Political Pulse ...
stxc.blogspot.com/2006/08/once-again-caller-times-tells-only.html - 32k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

Monday, May 07, 2007

"IN THE KNOW": Carlos Truan | Hugo Berlanga & The Primrose Path & Rangel Law School @ Texas A&I University.

"IN THE KNOW": Carlos Truan | Hugo Berlanga & The Primrose Path & Rangel Law School @ Texas A&I University.

Subject: ["IN THE KNOW"] Carlos Truan | Hugo Berlanga & The Primrose Path & Rangel Law...
To:
kenedenonews@gmail.com

[ http://storkclub-winchell.blogspot.com/2007/05/irma-rangel-legacy-relating-to.html]
http://www.ibcmemorial.org/irma.html

Monday, May 7, 2007
Carlos Truan | Hugo Berlanga | Henry Cuellar | Edwards, Al | Todd Hunter | Luci0 : The Primrose Path & Rangel Law School @ Texas A&I University.

Or posture for another agenda?



Who at that time wanted a Pharmacy College?



Celanese, King Ranch, URI?



Now we have this unorthodox legislation for an Engineering School @ TAMUCC?








This is a Developing Medical Community with the ability to become the finest in the world. Medical Nanotechnology is already here, $ are already here.

The Political Faction at TAMUCC will find their equilibrium eventually. An engineering school @ CCSU / TAMUCC is obtuse to the medical assets we have accumulated and the Philanthropy already well rooted in South Texas.


Irma Rangel Legislation was for the establishment of a law school at Texas A & I




The Age of Winchell: Irma Rangel Legacy : Relating to the establishment of a law school at Texas A&I University.



Hugo Berlanga | Henry Cuellar | Edwards, Al | Todd Hunter | Eddie Lucio


Bill: SB 646
Legislative Session: 71(R) Council Document: 71R 1835 MHT-D
Add to Bill List
Last Action:02/28/1989 S Reported favorably w/o amendments

Caption Version:Introduced
Caption Text:Relating to the establishment of a law school at Texas A&I University.

Author:Truan

Subjects:Education--Higher-- General (I0231)
TEXAS A&I UNIVERSITY (U2467)

Companion:HB 1630 by Rangel, Identical

Senate Committee: Education
Status:Out of committee
Vote:Ayes=9 Nays=1 Present Not Voting=0 Absent=1




--
Posted By The Advocate to Google Yourself Corpus Christi at 5/07/2007 02:46:00 AM

Friday, April 20, 2007

"IN THE KNOW": Remember The Crime Stoppers "Vandalism" of the Corpus Christi Country Club Golf Coursehigh powered members who control our nation’s eco